User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 26

Archive 20

←

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 46.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 46.jpg/3 has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Durham 2025 102 - St Oswald's Church, Durham.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:54, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Durham 2025 121 - Institute for Computational Cosmology.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Well done! --Augustgeyler 21:44, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Newcastle 2025 010 - The Response.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:54, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 646 - Sub Fun Cinco.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 17:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 525 - Volcan de Teno.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Manchester 2025 019 - Grosvenor Picture Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:03, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 539 - International Brigades Memorial, Jubilee Gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 10:11, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 088 - Max Miller by Peter Webster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. But we would need to make the cobwebs... --JackyM59 10:10, 1 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rembrandtbrug, Leiden 2016 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:56, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gawthorpe Hall 2016 039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ROCKY 07:43, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museu Paulista 2016 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 07:45, 2 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jet2 Holidays G-HLYF at Manchester Airport 2025 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Juneyao Air B-1115 at Manchester Airport 2025 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 071 - Volkswagen T1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:56, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 087 - Max Miller by Peter Webster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:54, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Durham 2025 093 - Gravestones at St Oswald's Churchyard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:20, 3 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 309 - Lady Henry Somerset Memorial Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --E bailey 15:13, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 310 - Statue of John Stuart Mill, London.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:21, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 089 - Max Miller by Peter Webster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Valencia 2025 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:46, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 073 - Volkswagen T1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 08:37, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Confucio, Montevideo 2017 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 15:45, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Valencia 2025 032 - Monument a Ramón Gómez Ferrer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --E bailey 15:18, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Musée de Grenoble 2025 096 - Laurent Guetal, La Bérarde en Oisans et la vallée de la Pilatte, 1882.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Musée de Grenoble 2025 096 - Laurent Guetal, La Bérarde en Oisans et la vallée de la Pilatte, 1882.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Manchester 2025 020 - Grosvenor Picture Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments PC needs to be redone here. The right part of the building is leaning in, while the left part is vertical. Perhaps the image is also slightly tilted. --Augustgeyler 15:02, 4 December 2025 (UTC) Perspective redone using a different vertical line on the right (I think something is wonky with the buildings), does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:28, 5 December 2025 (UTC)  Support Well done, good quality. --Augustgeyler 17:53, 5 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 8 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Durham 2025 043 - Durham Light Infantry Memorial Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:41, 6 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 9 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Museu Paulista 2016 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 21:03, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2025

Hello! I thought you might be interested in the UK’s Wiki Science Competition, which has an astronomy category. This regional edition of the international biannual photography competition is running from December 10 until January 10 to creatively celebrate the UK’s scientific innovation and the scientists that make it possible, while enhancing open knowledge. Prizes are available! For more information, see our commons page. Manxshearwater (talk) 22:57, 10 December 2025 (UTC)

@Manxshearwater: Thanks, I'm on the international jury, so I probably shouldn't participate. ;-) I'll do some advertising of it off-wiki though, thanks for the prompt, and good luck with the competition in the UK! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:09, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

@Manxshearwater: BTW, you probably want to link the UK competition from Commons:Wiki Science Competition 2025 too! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you - sorted that now. All the best with the international competition! Manxshearwater (talk) 11:35, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Formatting Wikidata query

Hi, Could you please help me there: COM:VP#Formatting Wikidata query? Thanks, Yann (talk) 20:33, 11 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (14 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 072 - Volkswagen T1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)

Category:Washinton Confederate Monument

Category:Washinton Confederate Monument is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

Washington Confederate Monument

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.

---

Deltaspace42 (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

Merry Christmas and warm wishes for a joyful, healthy, and peaceful New Year 2026! -- Radomianin (talk) 11:07, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Happy holidays! * 2026 !

	* Happy Holidays! *
	Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Joyeux Noël et bonne année! Frohe Weihnachten und ein glückliches Neues Jahr! Wesołych Świąt i Szczęśliwego Nowego Roku! Щасливого Різдва i з Новим роком! Boldog karácsonyt és boldog új évet! Καλά Χριστούγεννα και καλή χρονιά!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 14:41, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 566 - Westminster Bridge with Palace of Westminster .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:44, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Painshill 2025 152 - Temple of Bacchus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:21, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Sardinia 2025 030 - Sardinia Radio Telescope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Laitche 19:17, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2025 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 22:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Sardinia 2025 010 - Sardinia Radio Telescope.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Sardinia 2025 010 - Sardinia Radio Telescope.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 927 - Citroën HY food truck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Question from the past

Are you still an astronomer as you were in the Canary Islands? I learned a great deal from you about astronomy. (e.g. I learned about all those number stars and clusters and have been putting them in categories.) So thanks. Krok6kola (talk) 16:06, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

@Krok6kola: Hi, good to hear from you. :) Yup, I'm still an astronomer, just London-based nowadays. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:07, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (09 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 010 - Tram track construction between Kompassi and Vanasadam.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:31, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 013 - Building at Gonsiori tänav.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:32, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 196 - Church of Holy Spirit Timepiece.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Very nice job --Gower 08:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Lovely shot! --Ethmostigmus 09:23, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 319 - Tallinn power plant seen from Fat Margaret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Gower 08:18, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 927 - Citroën HY food truck.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:48, 5 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 9 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Cornelius Chapel, Governors Island 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 19:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 18:24, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryanair EI-EVL at London Stansted Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Herpking 06:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2026 (UTC)

Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026

Hello! I came across your name on a previous Wikimedia hackathon participant page, so I thought you might be interested in this.

We're organizing the Wikimedia Hackathon Northwestern Europe 2026, taking place on 13–14 March 2026 in Arnhem, the Netherlands. It's a two-day, in-person hackathon for technical Wikimedians from the region.

Since you've attended a hackathon before, you already know how valuable these events can be for collaboration, learning, and getting things done together. We'd love to have you join us!

Apply here – registration closes mid-January or when full.

Feel free to reach out if you have any questions. Hope to see you in Arnhem! Daanvr (talk) 14:56, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

@Daanvr: Thanks, it sounds like a really interesting event, but unfortunately I can't do those days due to other meetings. I hope there's another in the future! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:59, 12 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2025 099 - Battle Scene by Jan Martszen de Jonge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:51, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

File:At London 2025 378.jpg

Hi:

Could you tell what this photo of a tree taken in 2025 has to do with the Great storm of 1987 since there is no description on it?

Pierre cb (talk) 02:00, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

@Pierre cb: Hmm, it seems to have become disconnected from its companion photo that explains it, see File:At London 2025 377.jpg. I've added a description, hope that clarifies things. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:33, 14 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lacock Abbey 2015 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 10:52, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colégio Naval, Angra dos Reis 2019 42.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:11, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 901 - Formula One car.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:40, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 908 - Brixton tube station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:40, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 994 - King’s Cross Light Tunnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:40, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 995 - King’s Cross Light Tunnel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 13:36, 17 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:40, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2025 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 13:40, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 867 - Alexandra Gate Lodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Visible violett chromatic aberration should be removed --F. Riedelio 16:54, 13 January 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the review, new version uploaded, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:22, 16 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:19, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 912 - 23 Gower Place, Bloomsbury.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 923 - Pewterers Hall entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 928 - Friends Meeting House Euston.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0140 - Statue of John Wilkes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:10, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0166 - Centre Point.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 23:45, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 063 - Muelle Pesquero Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 19:14, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 070 - Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Carmen, Los Cristianos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 072 - Iglesia de Nuestra Señora del Carmen, Los Cristianos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please remove the wire in top --Michielverbeek 10:01, 19 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Gower 10:25, 19 January 2026 (UTC) Line at the top removed. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:26, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 088 - Playa Honda, Los Cristianos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aciarium 15:29, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (23 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Government Buildings, Dublin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 064 - Muelle Pesquero Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:56, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 065 - Muelle Pesquero Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 01:44, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 863 - Monument to Francisco Morazán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 865 - Monument to Francisco Morazán.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 01:36, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 556 - Avontuur IV on the River Thames.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:19, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 569 - Westminster Bridge with Palace of Westminster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 09:20, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 830 - Darcie and May Green.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 831 - Narrowboat Frodsham Castle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 866 - Alexandra Lodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 20 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At London 2026 0166 - Centre Point.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At London 2026 0166 - Centre Point.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

Pi bot not adding wikidata infobox when other template present

Category:Ice House, Acton has been linked to Wikidata since 30 June 2025 but hasn't had an infobox added, possibly because it's contents begins with {{Listed building England|1249830}}. This causes categories like Category:Listed building England ID without linked Wikidata to be clogged with cats that are linked to WD but for some technical reason aren't recognised as being connected without the infobox. Would you mind looking into this? Tæppa (talk) 18:27, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Hmm, that's interesting. It's not being picked up by the database query that identifies possible categories to add the title to, so Pi bot's not looking at it. @Enhancing999: I think you helped last time this happened, can you spot a modification to the queries at [1] and [2] that would catch this, or should we take this to phab? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Actually, I'm not sure if Enhancing999 is still around, so now raised at https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T415218 . Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:07, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Pi bot sometimes also misses templates that use {{en| description}} [3] or {{Object location| coords}} [4] (examples are where I've manually added the infobox), so I think it might be something to do with it not knowing where to put the infobox if a cat "page" starts with {{template}}[[category:cat]], but it does add it if there's a (double?) line break between the last "}}" and first "[[", [5]. Tæppa (talk) 08:55, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Also, The infobox doesn't like being before other templates that take up the full width of a page [6]. Examples of non full-width templates with infobox on either side:

[7] [8] Tæppa (talk) 09:02, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 January 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 068 - Muelle Pesquero Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs more precise filename and description (shows only part of the statue). --Tagooty 04:06, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Description updated, both here and in the SDC caption. The filename is already fairly precise? Thanks. Mike Peel 20:11, 23 January 2026 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:19, 24 January 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Tallinn 2024 196 - Church of Holy Spirit Timepiece.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Tallinn 2024 196 - Church of Holy Spirit Timepiece.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 27 January 2026 (UTC)

Pibot revert

Hi, I added qid=Q9566064 to the Wikidata Infobox of Category:Female opera vocalists from Slovakia to link it to Category:Slovak women opera singers (Q9566064) rather than List of Slovak opera singers (Q12053264). Do you know why Pibot reverted me here? TSventon (talk) 20:27, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

@TSventon: That happened because you didn't need to specify the QID manually, the category was already linked to Category:Slovak women opera singers (Q9566064), and that points to List of Slovak opera singers (Q12053264) as its main topic. So everything's fine on Commons, but Wikidata looks like it needs some clean-up (which I've done a bit of). It seems that there's Category:Slovak women opera singers (Q9566064), Category:Slovak male opera singers (Q108863330), and Category:Slovak opera singers (Q8265703). List of Slovak opera singers (Q12053264) should only link to the latter directly. All of them should probably have category combines topics (P971) items that describe them. Cases like this where people have set up gendered categories tend to get a bit complex. :-/ Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:29, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

How to show the size of a frame or mount with Artwork template?

Hi, May be you know the answer about Template talk:Artwork#Dimensions? Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:43, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Replied there. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:48, 22 February 2026 (UTC)

Pi Bot

• The pi bot connects Wikidata to Commons Categories, but what will happens when the Commons Category field at Wikidata is already filled with an incorrect value? Will it overwrite or ignore? See: Category:Alfred William Amandus Plate and Q123705390. --RAN (talk) 20:05, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

  @Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): The wrong Commons category was linked to, I've moved the existing one to Platé & Co. (Q85723590) and added this category. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:41, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Thanks, do you know if the bot will replace, or ignore? I think it will ignore. --RAN (talk) 20:15, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Pi bot should come along and remove the manual QID at some point, I don't think it'll do more than that. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:16, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (30 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Nairobi Railway Museum 2025 004 - Kenya & Uganda Railway No. 327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:52, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 570 - Westminster Bridge with Palace of Westminster.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:02, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0093 - New Bridge Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --D-Kuru 21:39, 27 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (31 March 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 948 - Grand Junction Railway 49 Columbine (LNWR 1868).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 19:11, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0048 - Mosaic at Tottenham Court Road tube station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 18:29, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 878 - Paparazzi Pack Statues, Norfolk Square Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. I’m recommending it because there are some wonderful areas, but the waistband of the ‘dog’ trousers that are on display is a bit of a let-down – they’re a bit of a let-down. --Lmbuga 19:00, 28 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0092 - 13 New Bridge Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments right side seems to need slight PC --D-Kuru 21:39, 27 March 2026 (UTC) I've redone the perspective correction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:04, 28 March 2026 (UTC)  Support Yes, thank you. Good quality. --D-Kuru 00:21, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (01 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0071 - Black Friar public house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 21:31, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0090 - Site of Priory of the Blackfriers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:58, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 851 - Metropolitan Electric Supply Company (METESCo) supply cover.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 20:46, 29 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (02 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 852 - Radnor Mews.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 17:51, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Brighton 2025 003 - Brighton West Pier.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:39, 30 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (03 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Musée de Grenoble 2025 296 - Le lac de l'Eychauda by Laurent Guétal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Musée de Grenoble 2025 297 - Laurent Guetal- La Bérarde en Oisans et la vallée de la Pilatte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:28, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Osterley Park 2025 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:34, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 451 - Hayward Gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 904 - Ritzy Cinema.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose The full-backs in the picture – both the right-back and the left-back – are terrible. A 1-on-1 cut might be a good idea --Lmbuga 18:49, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Difficult photo--Lmbuga 12:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)  Info I struck the opposing vote because Lmbuga also added a later supporting vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:38, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (04 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wikimedia Summit 2024 028 - Tobias Lindner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:02, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Musée de Grenoble 2025 296 - Le lac de l'Eychauda by Laurent Guétal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:21, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Musée de Grenoble 2025 297 - Laurent Guetal- La Bérarde en Oisans et la vallée de la Pilatte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:28, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Osterley Park 2025 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:34, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 451 - Hayward Gallery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 17:18, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Durham 2025 001 - Durham University Business School - Waterside Building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight PC is needed at right. --Sebring12Hrs 17:34, 31 March 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the review, PC tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:30, 1 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Of course it is. --Sebring12Hrs 18:55, 1 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 904 - Ritzy Cinema.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Oppose The full-backs in the picture – both the right-back and the left-back – are terrible. A 1-on-1 cut might be a good idea --Lmbuga 18:49, 28 March 2026 (UTC) Difficult photo--Lmbuga 12:56, 30 March 2026 (UTC)  Info I struck the opposing vote because Lmbuga also added a later supporting vote. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 16:38, 31 March 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (05 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 142 - Cathedral in Katowice.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:07, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:38, 2 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (06 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0086 - St. Paul's Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice lighting. --D-Kuru 20:16, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0094 - Procession House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --D-Kuru 20:16, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0095 - Bridewell Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:02, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0101 - St Bride Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 17:02, 3 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

2024 Picture of the Year:Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows using a mixture of cow urine and ash as a ritualistic and protective practice in a temporary cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2025 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the twentieth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just five images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 18 April 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2024 Picture of the Year contest.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (07 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Valencia 2025 394 - EES kiosks.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:00, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vueling Airbus A320 (EC-MBS) @ VLC, October 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mãe Preta (Lucílio de Albuquerque) 2025 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 19:24, 4 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mãe Preta (Lucílio de Albuquerque) 2025 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:58, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (08 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Vienna 2025 026 - Wiener Riesenrad.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Vienna 2025 064 - Tegetthoffdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (I hope you also took an image of the statue in the middle) --D-Kuru 22:58, 5 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Vienna 2025 157 - Volkswagen Type 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:31, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (10 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Vienna 2025 029 - Globus (Prater).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Kadı 21:13, 7 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Vienna 2025 051 - Tegetthoffdenkmal.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Maybe it's just me but to me it looks like it's leaning a bit to the left (needs slight rotation) --D-Kuru 22:58, 5 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I've redone the perspective, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 09:57, 8 April 2026 (UTC)  Support Changes applied. Good quality. --D-Kuru 14:15, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 April 2026 (UTC)

File:High Line, New York 2012 07.jpg

File:High Line, New York 2012 07.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:High Line, New York 2012 07.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:42, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

File:High Line, New York 2012 06.jpg

File:High Line, New York 2012 06.jpg has been nominated for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:High Line, New York 2012 06.jpg This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much! If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 16:56, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2025 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favourite images featured on Commons during the last year (2025) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of five images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2025.

Round 2 will end at 2 May 2026, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:10, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 569 - Banana plant flower at Palmetum de Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:43, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 601 - Centro Internacional de Ferias y Congresos, Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 21:51, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 604 - Consolea at Palmetum de Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:48, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 190 - tenement house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo, but could do with raising black/shadow level, and possibly a different denoising algorithm or settings. Too much information lost currently for QI in my opinion. --Plasmium 19:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I've revised the lighting levels, and redone the noise reduction, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:32, 17 April 2026 (UTC)  Support I think it looks a lot better than before; cars have better definition now. And with the latest perspective correction I think this is QI. --Plasmium 21:48, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! EasyJet Airbus A319 (G-EZDA) @ VLC, October 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:45, 17 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 540 - International Brigades Memorial, Jubilee Gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 21:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 839 - Paddington station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poconaco 21:42, 18 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (22 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 599 - Auditorio de Tenerife.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 10:58, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 146 - Monument to Saint John Paul II.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 10:48, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 22 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2026 0115 - Statue of Hodge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:19, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (28 April 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 607 - Consolea at Palmetum de Santa Cruz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 08:04, 25 April 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:47, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

You may be an eligible candidate for the U4C election

Greetings,

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) seeks candidates for the 2026 election. The U4C is the global committee responsible for overseeing enforcement of the Universal Code of Conduct. Elections are held annually, if elected a committee member serves for two years.

This year the U4C requires candidates to hold administrator rights on at least one wiki, which is why you are being contacted as you appear to hold this right. There are other requirements, such as candidates must be at least 18 years old and may not be employed by the Wikimedia Foundation or other related chapters and affiliates. You can find more information in the call for candidates on Meta-wiki. Additionally, the committee's working language is English; some ability to communicate in English is required.

The election opens on 18 May, if you are eligible and interested you have until 10 May to submit your candidacy. There will week between for candidates to answer questions from the community. Voting takes place privately in SecurePoll, successful candidates must receive at least 60% support. More information is available on the 2026 Elections page, including timelines and other candidacy information. If you read over the material and consider yourself qualified, please consider submitting your name to run for the committee. If you think someone else in your community might be interested and qualified, please encourage them to run.

In partnership with the U4C -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:30, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Announcing the Winners of Picture of the Year 2025!

Hi everyone,

Wikimedia Commons is pleased to finally announce the winners of this year's Picture of the Year 2025 contest! We had some truly incredible finalists to choose from, but the community has spoken.

Here are your top three winning images:

• 

  

  First place: The aftermath of an Israeli airstrike in Gaza City on October 9, 2023, leaving widespread destruction in the Rimal area.
  Attribution: WAFA (Q2915969) / CC-BY-SA 3.0
• 

  

  Second place: Baby cape fur seal (Arctocephalus pusillus) sleeping at Cape cross, Namibia.
  Attribution: Giles Laurent / CC-BY-SA 4.0
• 

  

  Third place: A gigantic jet photographed from the International Space Station by astronaut Nichole Ayers.
  Attribution: public domain

You can view the full results and see where all your favorite images placed here: Full 2025 Results

I also want to highlight what an incredible turnout we had. In the second round, we saw a massive jump in both the number of users voting and the total votes cast. We had exactly 13,979 votes cast by 3,509 users! To put that in perspective, last year we had 7,403 votes from 2,837 users. It is amazing to see that level of growth and community engagement.

Thank you to everyone who voted, helped organize, and generally made the contest such a huge success this year!

Regards,
ZI Jony
For the POTY Committee 20:04, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (26 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 024 - Agave attenuata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plasmium 23:54, 23 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 037 - Echinopsis huascha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 02:23, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 May 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (27 May 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salvador, Bahia 2025 011 - Aircraft at Manchester Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:11, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salvador, Bahia 2025 003 - Aircraft at Manchester Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:11, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salvador, Bahia 2025 020 - TC-RBS at Manchester Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:11, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salvador, Bahia 2025 022 - CS-TAY at Manchester Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:11, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KLM Airbus A321neo (PH-AXA) @ MAN, 2025-07-16 (03).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 21:06, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 013 - orchid in hanging basket.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:03, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 034 - leaf snake.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:33, 24 May 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 27 May 2026 (UTC)

File:At Paraty 2023 277.jpg

Hey Mike, hope you are well. I just reused one of your beautiful photos, but totally forgot how to link this derivative work to the original. Can you help me?

CalliandraDysantha (talk) 06:40, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (11 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2025 136 - Bust of Lady Morgan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Pdanese 01:18, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2025 145 - Nita Maria Schonfeld Resch by Conrad Dressler.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 21:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 11 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (12 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 096 - Minas de San José.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:19, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 124 - View from Teide Cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:20, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 148 - Teide peak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:22, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Victoria and Albert Museum 2025 152 - A Putto holding the Crown and coat of arms of Ireland.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 14:09, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (13 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 094 - Minas de San José.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Skander zarrad 07:57, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 167 - Teide Cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:45, 10 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 13 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 060 - Pendennis Castle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 060 - Pendennis Castle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (16 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 060 - Little Island at Pier 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:31, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 211 - SSM-N-8 Regulus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:19, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (17 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 064 - Begonia malabarica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ReneeWrites 23:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 097 - 524 W42nd Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Superbass 09:57, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 100 - Citi Bikes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 15:47, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 640 - Zingiber spectabile.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 640 - Zingiber spectabile.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Wilfredor (talk) 02:19, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (18 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 187 - Shepherd by John Cheere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:30, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 188 - Shepherdess by John Cheere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:11, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 566 - Musaceae flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 06:30, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Paranapiacaba 2023 079 - Armstrong Whitworth braking locomotives.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Paranapiacaba 2023 079 - Armstrong Whitworth braking locomotives.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Wilfredor (talk) 13:04, 19 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (20 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 063 - Orchids.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:57, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 20 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (21 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 564 - Musaceae flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 17:56, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:At Tenerife 2026 566 - Musaceae flower.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:At Tenerife 2026 566 - Musaceae flower.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/Wilfredor (talk) 13:23, 23 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (24 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2026 583 - View of Santa Cruz de Tenerife from the Palmetum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romzig 20:57, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 058 - Orchid fish.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:48, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 092 - Hudson Yards.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:38, 21 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:55, 24 June 2026 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion (25 June 2026)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kew Gardens 2026 073 - Fern.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 11:44, 22 June 2026 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Infobox

Hi. Why did pi bot not add an infobox to Category:Tiverton United Church or Category:Throop Mill? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 12:04, 14 July 2026 (UTC)

@Mike Peel — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:50, 17 July 2026 (UTC)

This is odd. Those categories aren't in the database query results that Pi bot is looking through to add the Infoboxes, but I'm not entirely sure if that's because the query is wrong or because the database is wrong. Given that Pi bot is adding Infoboxes to other categories, I suspect the latter. I'll try to check into this more soon, but this is probably worth raising a ticket about on Phabricator about database inconsistencies... Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 18:15, 17 July 2026 (UTC)