Jump to content

User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Archive 20 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25 Archive 26

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 11:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 11:11, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Noordwijk 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 11:02, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Lua errors

Mike, I noticed lua errors at File:Jodrell Bank Mark II 5.jpg. I am not familiar with the template used. Can you have a look? Jarekt (talk) 20:06, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Jarekt: Thanks for the heads-up. It's an experimental template that was meant to be along the lines of the Wikidata Infobox but for file pages (using SDC), but I haven't had the time to get it to a stable status that could be used more widely. This issue's been fixed with [1]. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:31, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 325.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:17, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari 2024 85.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 10:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Science Museum, London 2025 115.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:43, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Laguna, Tenerife 2019 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 07:01, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari 2024 78.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island Maritime Museum 2025 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island Maritime Museum 2025 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Noordwijk 2024 007.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 06:07, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WikiZaterdag Utrecht 12 October 2024 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Amsterdam Airport Schiphol 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:20, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari 2024 75.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:19, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:10, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 13 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:58, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Brackenheim 19:53, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wiki Indaba 2023 187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Wiki Indaba 2023 188.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aciarium 17:05, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cheadle, Staffordshire 2025 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:43, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:42, 12 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 13:36, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 12:49, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality.Andrei Stroe 09:23, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 208.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:28, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island Maritime Museum 2025 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:32, 13 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 209.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 17:37, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:37, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:02, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 493.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:16, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Seems slightly tilted to the right --Acroterion 02:30, 10 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oops, I was using the window borders as guides, but they are tilted. Perspective redone using other verticals, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:20, 11 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Yes, better. The taper on the pilaster to the right makes it a little complicated. --Acroterion 02:25, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:45, 15 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:23, 16 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:33, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1303.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rione Colonna 09:32, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
cw tilt --Poco a poco 08:32, 9 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:43, 16 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Laguna, Tenerife 2019 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 21:50, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rohit14400 08:16, 17 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:43, 18 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Laguna, Tenerife 2019 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Laguna, Tenerife 2019 152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 485.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 06:42, 18 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 497.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs a PC --Poco a poco 18:50, 15 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:03, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:45, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2024 439.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 07:18, 19 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 394.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 477.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 17:03, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 480.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 17:03, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 10:39, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 22 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 15:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! California Highway One 2015 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:23, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 123.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bgag 03:54, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 542.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 544.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:12, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:23, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good composition. QI IMO --Lmbuga 20:20, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 12:22, 23 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:40, 23 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At La Laguna, Tenerife 2019 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 01:49, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 124.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cheadle, Staffordshire 2025 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
could you add a more specific cat? is that a pillory? --Poco a poco 07:21, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review. It's in Category:Market Cross, Cheadle, I think that's the most specific category it could reasonbaly be in. It's definitely not a en:Pillory, I think it's what remains of the cross now. Thanks. Mike Peel 18:08, 24 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Ok, thanks, QI --Poco a poco 23:44, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 15:58, 24 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Cagliari 2024 77.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Acroterion 21:45, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:14, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1353.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1357.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1364.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 400 - Albert Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality in my eyes, but title should be more precise. The other images "At London" too.--Milseburg 10:32, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 06:52, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Thanks, better now, QI in my eyes. --Milseburg 14:11, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ROCKY 06:17, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:27, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 06:18, 26 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2019 492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would promote if it you fix the tilted horizion. --Plozessor 17:10, 25 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review. Good spot, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:50, 26 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Very good now! --Plozessor 04:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

LIRR Railroad Crossing video

Where was this File:Train crossing in Long Island.webm video? I keep trying to guess but I still haven't got any ideas. --DanTD (talk) 01:30, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

@DanTD: Ah, the GPS coordinates didn't upload, sorry! Added now, it was at Southampton Bypass. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 12:23, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:23, 27 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:28, 27 May 2025 (UTC) The file name could be more meaningful. --Milseburg 19:51, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1352.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:21, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 07:20, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:22, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1351.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 19:48, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 510.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice composition. Please consider adding a GPS location. --Domob 11:54, 28 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Puerto de la Cruz 2023 230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1359.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benjism89 20:07, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 495.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:42, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:40, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I don't want to reject it, and I'm fine with the picture being accepted as is, but it's a bit noisy for my taste. --Lvova 15:26, 30 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support I'm not seeing the noise at the original resolution. Good quality --Crisco 1492 00:50, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Brixton, London 2025 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:03, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 498.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Strong CAs at the upper left and right. --Sebring12Hrs 09:44, 27 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, I hadn't spotted those. CA's tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:14, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 23:19, 30 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:19, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 21:16, 29 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Ziv 14:51, 31 May 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:29, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:37, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:37, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 130.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:49, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 4 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:52, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:53, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 00:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 40.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 17:05, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 031 - Empire State Building seen from the High Line.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Picture is ok but file name is not, see other discussion. --Plozessor 03:24, 31 May 2025 (UTC)Reply
File renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:32, 1 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 17:59, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I'm crossing the fingers, but good quality for me. --Lvova 14:13, 2 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 407 - Albert Memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Shougissime 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plánovací kalendář 08:14, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 230.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --A S M Jobaer 06:32, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:42, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:44, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 52.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 16:39, 6 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 9 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 053.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At the Intrepid Museum 2023 216.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jewel Changi, Singapore 2023 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 09:10, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 09:43, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:08, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Earth 2025

Logo Wiki Loves Earth
Logo Wiki Loves Earth

Hello! We are happy to announce that Wiki Loves Earth 2025 started on June 1st. Your participation will help us to document the nature of the UK and show it to the world through Wikipedia and other projects.

We have competitions running in Wales, Scotland, England and Northern Ireland. Please go to the page of the relevant nation's contest to read the rules:
Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2025 in Wales
Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2025 in Scotland
Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2025 in England
Commons:Wiki Loves Earth 2025 in Northern Ireland
There you can also find out how to take part in the contest.

Thanks,
Wikimedia UK - 07:01, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

You are receiving this message because you took part in the contest before

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1363 - Barco del Porís.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ArildV 19:44, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 021 - Stourhead Granary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 026 - Stable Yard building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:42, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:12, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support QI for me. Looks like you would have been miserable, though. --Crisco 1492 03:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 025 - Stable Yard building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:43, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1365 - TF-1 as seen from the Barco del Porís monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 513 - Temperate House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would probably look better as 16:9 image without large portions of the empty sky and grass at top and bottom. --Красный 12:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:20, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Красный 08:44, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 332 - Wave breaking at Mesa del Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would support, if the title is improved.--Milseburg 20:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Milseburg 12:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 14 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 236 - IACTEC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Harlock81 11:08, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 241 - old building in El Charcón.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:52, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 247 - Parque las Mantecas gates.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:10, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 027.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but could you please get rid of the disturbing elements at bottom left and top right (benches)? --Poco a poco 17:58, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:13, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:12, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 17:38, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At The Courts Garden 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:58, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CAs on the trees and leafs of the left side --Grunpfnul 18:17, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, CA tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:48, 11 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 14:50, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 030 - Stourhead House across the lawn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support at first glance it looks tilted, but on closer inspection it is good quality --Lvova 14:47, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1365 - TF-1 as seen from the Barco del Porís monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:48, 12 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 513 - Temperate House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would probably look better as 16:9 image without large portions of the empty sky and grass at top and bottom. --Красный 12:27, 8 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, cropped, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:20, 10 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Красный 08:44, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 332 - Wave breaking at Mesa del Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would support, if the title is improved.--Milseburg 20:15, 5 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, file renamed. Thanks. Mike Peel 11:55, 8 June 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality --Milseburg 12:33, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 029 - Douglas C-47 Skytrain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 090 - Tiger I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 096 - BA-64.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:07, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 099 - Tiger I.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Benlisquare 06:19, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 233 - IACTEC.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please, check the verticals on the left --Poco a poco 15:09, 12 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, perspective tweaked, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:22, 13 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 19:54, 14 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 03:53, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 343 - Water breaking at Mesa del Mar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 487 - Volcan de Teno and Ragnarok at the Port of Los Cristianos behind Playa Honda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 12:15, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 499 - Ragnarok departing from the port of Los Cristianos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:31, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 518 - Volcan de Teno at Puerto de Los Cristianos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:28, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 199.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Remontees 22:04, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:29, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Stourhead 2022 013 - Stourhead House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 14:54, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 496 - Replica of Donatello's David.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:19, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 212 - Statue of James Outram, Victoria Embankment Gardens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 10:57, 16 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Nuffield Place 2025 030 - Morris Minor 1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:28, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 503 - Playa Honda, Los Cristianos.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 12:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Paranapiacaba 2023 192.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1438 - Windmill of Barranco Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:01, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 237 - Parque las Mantecas.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:34, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 21 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Nuffield Place 2025 033 - Morris Minor 1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It would be nice if the car was shown in the center of the picture. ~~~~ --Jamshid Nurkulov 00:42, 18 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, crop redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:37, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Thank you, I think everything looks much better now. Good quality. ~~~~ --Jamshid Nurkulov 19:40, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 22 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cynara scolymus - at Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2025 049 - Urn in Temperate House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2025 055 - Queen Charlotte's Cottage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:47, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 03:27, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:35, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 10:37, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Location of bridge

Do you know what bridge this is? (or even what city?) File:Old photos (MP) 221.jpg It needs to be identified and categorized, but I cannot determine where it is, and there is no information on the file page (for that or two similar photos you uploaded), not even the country. Steve Morgan (talk) 06:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Steve Morgan: They are photos I took in the 90's with a film camera and scanned in, so I have no metadata, nor memory of where the bridge is, sorry. It's most likely somewhere in the UK. I was hoping that someone here would know! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:34, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Found it! Category:Haven Bridge, Great Yarmouth. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:45, 24 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
That's great! Thanks. Steve Morgan (talk) 00:19, 25 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1441 - Windmill of Barranco Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1439 - Windmill of Barranco Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 13:46, 23 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 06:26, 27 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Nuffield Place 2025 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Top crop is too tight. --Sebring12Hrs 19:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the review, perspective redone, and more of the top has been recovered - does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:33, 19 June 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 16:23, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 11:45, 28 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1447 - Windmill of Barranco Grande.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:21, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2024 275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Юрий Д.К. 09:53, 29 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 2 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Nuffield Place 2025 035 - Morris Minor 1000.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Syntaxys 19:37, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 3 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Commons:Village_pump#Category:Recipients_of_awards

Hi. Any chance you could comment on the discussion about how infoboxes add categories for medals to Commons since you seem to be the main editor of the template and we're kind of at a lose to how the whole thing works? Thanks. --Adamant1 (talk) 19:33, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Adamant1: Thanks for the heads up - I've added some context there, hope that helps. I'm travelling at the moment, so apologies if I'm slow to follow up further. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:17, 23 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Category:Wikidata_infobox_maintenance

Category discussion warning

Wikidata infobox maintenance has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


166.181.89.146 05:04, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley Park 2025 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:11, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2025 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:11, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2025 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Crisco 1492 00:11, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G-WUKM, Airbus A321neo of Wizz Air UK at London Luton Airport 2025 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:05, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sambourne 2025 009 - Green Dragon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:14, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Alcester 2025 001 - The Bear Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:05, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley Park 2025 048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:23, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Osterley Park 2025 050.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tisha Mukherjee 05:23, 13 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2025 001 - Hudson Yards skyline, New York, at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:11, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 17 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 024 - High Line Section 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lvova 14:50, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 058 - Bruce T. Draine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:07, 15 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:48, 18 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 045 - 10th Avenue and 14th Street, Manhattan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Romzig 11:52, 16 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At New York City 2023 056 - Little Island at Pier 55 seen from Pier 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 17:57, 17 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:46, 20 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! G-WUKM, Airbus A321neo of Wizz Air UK at London Luton Airport 2025 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:38, 21 August 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 24 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

UK Listed Buildings and commons_import_ids_to_wikidata.py

Is it possible to have the wiki commons UK listed building IDs synced on to wikidata? I think this is something that commons_import_ids_to_wikidata.py might be doing but there seems to be a large backlog of pages that have not been processed? Thx TimSC (talk) 19:50, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

@TimSC: Is that a specific template? I suspect the answer is yes, but I'm not keen on doing something like that right before WLM starts - it might be something to come back to in October. Unless @Richard Nevell (WMUK): wants something like this to happen. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:03, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I'm mostly interested in https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:Listed_building_England I guess you are right WLM is around the corner. TimSC (talk) 19:08, 30 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Take part in the Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil survey!

Hello @Mike Peel,

contest logo

We are conducting a survey to learn more about the experiences of those who participated in Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil. Your feedback is very important to us as we assess the impact of the contest and plan future editions.

The survey is quick and only takes a few minutes to complete.

Click here to respond to the survey!

We thank you in advance for your collaboration and for being part of this initiative to promote cultural heritage in Brazil.

Sincerely, Wiki Loves Monuments Brasil Team EPorto (WMB) (talk) 03:22, 2 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wikidata Infobox

Hi! We already were in contact on Template_talk:Wikidata_Infobox#Next_transport_to_the_productive_version. It would be great for some citiwikies, if the current sandbox-version of Wikidata Infobox would be transferred to the productive version. Can you help us here? Thank you very, very much in advance! Bebbe (talk) 08:28, 9 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Bebbe: Sorry for the delay, the new version of the infobox has now been made live. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Dear Mike Peel, thank you very, very, very much!!!!!!! You won a new fan in the east of Bavaria :-) ! Bebbe (talk) 07:17, 15 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

File:At New York 2012 34.jpg

File:At New York 2012 34.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grand-Duc (talk) 21:15, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:At New York 2012 33.jpg

File:At New York 2012 33.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grand-Duc (talk) 21:19, 16 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Maps of the Cocos (Keeling) Islands

There is no wikidata entry for this topic. The category page had a wikidata infobox for "Women in the Cocos (Keeling) Islands", which I removed as irrelevant. Is there some way to stop your bot from putting it back again? - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 05:47, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Sumanuil: [2] was the right thing to do, you also needed to remove the P373 value, now done. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:57, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Module:Wikidata Infobox

Revently on Module:Wikidata Infobox you updated it and added a duplicate "class=skin-invert". Would you be able to update it so that it's only included once as it's currently adding to the lint errors. Thanks. -- WOSlinker (talk) 14:08, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@WOSlinker: Thanks, it looks like @Ebrahim: removed it before from the module itself, but not from the sandbox where we stage changes, so it got lost when I copied the newest version over. Thanks for adding it to the sandbox with [3] - I'll sync that with a few other changes soon. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 19:47, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@WOSlinker: Now live, hope that's solved the lint error issue. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:16, 27 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

NHLE

Greetings! is one of the rare unphotographed Grade II listed academic buildings in London if you're ever around Bloomsbury way. Astonishing how many Wikidata NHLE items have been photographed so far! No Swan So Fine (talk) 11:21, 29 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

@No Swan So Fine: Hmm, that could be a tricky one. It does have photos in the list entry, so maybe it is accessible, but looking on Google Maps it's quite buried behind buildings... Will have to try at some point! Or maybe it's one for @Richard Nevell (WMUK): or someone else at WMUK, since it's quite close to the WMUK office! Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:43, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking part in Wiki Loves Monuments

Thank you for submitting great photos to the Wiki Loves Monuments competition! Your images will help us document our monuments and history.

I hope you’re enjoying the competition and thank you for your contributions! Gemma Coleman (WMUK) (talk) 10:27, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Gemma Coleman (WMUK): Thanks! As discussed with @Richard Nevell (WMUK): , please do not include any of my photos in the competition part. :) Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:37, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
It's Richard leading on the submissions so I'm sure that is already in hand but I will remind him to be doubly sure. Thanks! Gemma Coleman (WMUK) (talk) 11:52, 1 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:27, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:High Line, New York 2012 16.jpg

File:High Line, New York 2012 16.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 14:15, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Songbook of Zeghere van Male - superius 014 recto.jpg

Moin Mike, in Category:Uses of Wikidata Infobox are many Files and i beleave they are wrong there. Can you check this out? Thanks --Crazy1880 (talk) 17:48, 3 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Crazy1880: It looks like this was because @Marnanel: included a call to the Infobox in Module:Songbook of Zeghere - I've removed that now, but it'll take a while for the cache to update. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:42, 8 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Whoops. Sorry about that. Thanks for dealing with it. Marnanel (talk) 11:45, 9 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Moin Mike, thank you, now it looks good, thanks. @Marnanel, its hand and hand ;) Regards --Crazy1880 (talk) 15:24, 11 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Museum Displays File:At Valencia 2025 583.jpg

Please clarify the status of the 2D art shown, it looks like a mordern reproduction of classical period art? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:41, 13 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

I'm not sure, but it's just background to the display case, the artefacts on display are the main subject of the photo. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:44, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:At Valencia 2025 707.jpg

File:At Valencia 2025 707.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Joanbanjo (talk) 23:29, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:50, 26 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

File:Map of Manchester 1801.PNG

Hello Mike Peel, this is Saimmx from zhwp. I am currently checking the information of File:Map of Manchester 1801.PNG - while the image looks like a public domain, I am not very sure because it lacks source and author. Since And-Rew (Joshii later), the original uploader, might not been there for decades, and you uploaded the image to the Commons, can you help me to check the image's information? Thank you. Saimmx (talk) 07:16, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Saimmx: That took a bit of digging, but I'm fairly sure it's this one - actually from 1807 by J. Roper. The original's surely out of copyright by quite some time. It looks like the colouring is later, but that wouldn't add new copyright, I think? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 08:45, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. I think your reply is enough for detailing the image's copyright info. Saimmx (talk) 09:00, 27 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

tidy wikibox?

The bot seems to have reverted my implementation of the infobox template on a commons category (NS 14) page? The bot seem to prefer a broken infobox with no data over usage of the qid parameter. Can you tell me why that might be?

https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Salacia_(mythology)&oldid=1114577332

I've also left a note here: Talk:Salacia_(mythology)#gallery_page Jerimee (talk) 20:38, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Jerimee: It looks like it's because @Infovarius: changed the Wikidata sitelink back to the gallery. I'm not sure that Salacia (mythology) is actually useful to have, but the easiest thing to do in cases like this is to create a new Category item on Wikidata, which I've done at Category:Salacia (mythology) (Q136776369), so the infobox should work fine now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oh nice! I didn't know an item like Category:Salacia (mythology) (Q136776369) would pass along ("transclude") the contents of category's main topic (P301) - I've long been confused about that. Thanks so much! Jerimee (talk) 20:49, 13 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Special:Contributions/Kimbisden

All of my edits are reverted. Can you control them for bots where it's necessary? Thank yoy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2025-35045-39 (talk • contribs) 08:10, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (22 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 46.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:38, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Musée de Grenoble 2025 096 - Laurent Guetal, La Bérarde en Oisans et la vallée de la Pilatte, 1882.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --E bailey 01:31, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (23 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2025 010 - Sardinia Radio Telescope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Sardinia 2025 018 - Sardinia Radio Telescope.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Llez 06:47, 20 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 486 - Statue of Winston Churchill, Parliament Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 07:07, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At London 2025 487 - Statue of Winston Churchill, Parliament Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 06:35, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Lisbon 2025 051 - Statue of Bernardo de Sá Nogueira de Figueiredo, Marquês de Sá da Bandeira.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 06:35, 20 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (24 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World2Fly EC-OND at Lisbon Portela Airport 2025 279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 01:16, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Air France F-HEPB at Lisbon Portela Airport 2025 283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 02:22, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Musée de Grenoble 2025 095 - Laurent Guetal, Le Lac de L'Eychauda, 1892.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 09:43, 21 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (25 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2025 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 12:23, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2025 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Painshill 2025 144 - Temple of Bacchus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 07:31, 22 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Painshill 2025 146 - Temple of Bacchus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Painshill 2025 151 - Temple of Bacchus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:12, 22 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 25 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (27 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mãe Preta (Lucílio de Albuquerque) 2025 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Would you mind correcting the perspective horizontally to achieve parallelism? --Gower 07:47, 23 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Oops, I forgot to upload the new version, now done, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 18:34, 24 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. Thanks for the new version. --Gower 18:39, 24 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 27 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (29 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Durham 2025 091 - War Memorial Outside St Oswald's Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:55, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Durham 2025 097 - St Oswald's Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --JackyM59 20:55, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Durham 2025 107 - Boyd Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 21:22, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Durham 2025 126 - Ogden Centre for Fundamental Physics.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 21:34, 26 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
 Support Good quality. --Pdanese 21:35, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Science Competition 2025

Logo for Wiki Science Competition
Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of European Science Photo Competition 2015 and Wiki Science Competition 2017, Wiki Science Competition 2019, Wiki Science Competition 2021 and Wiki Science Competition 2023, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2025 has started in almost all the countries.

If you want to take part in WSC2025, please consult this page. Only some national categories are associated to competitions with local prizes.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface.

If you already took part in a country that has completed its upload phase (such as Chile or Bangladesh), please consider improving the description in English of your files (click on the edit button), since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them. World finalists will be finalized after March 2026.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.


Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list


Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2025 #WikiScience #WikiScience2025


Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery --08:37, 29 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (30 November 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Snugburys Lovell Telescope straw sculpture 2007 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Stunning subject. There is some noise or compression artefact at the clouds, but minor. --Augustgeyler 19:41, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Manchester 2008 059 - Upper Brook Street Chapel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:07, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North African mosaics, British Museum 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 21:32, 27 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion (01 December 2025)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 577 - Volcan de Taburiente.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 07:12, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Great Budworth 2007 01 - St Mary and All Saints' Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 28 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! At Toruń 2007 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Pangalau 05:30, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
Reply

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 December 2025 (UTC)Reply