User talk:Mike Peel/Archive 24

Archive 20

←

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

Archive 26

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:28, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 16:51, 5 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:35, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JoachimKohler-HB 07:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 07:07, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 08:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 08:09, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:26, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Engenho Central do Bracuhy 2018 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 57.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:59, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:13, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:42, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cagliari, Sardinia 2019 181.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:44, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 55.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:52, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 58.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:22, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 09:41, 9 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lake Como, Wikimania 2016, MP 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:00, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Antonio Stoppani, Wikimania 2016, MP 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 14:34, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brandenburg Gate 2017 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 07:59, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 499.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Too dark. --Kallerna 07:09, 9 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, brightened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 06:47, 10 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Better! --Kallerna 13:56, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beamish Museum 2016 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RMLI Riverhead 2018 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:22, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RMLI Riverhead 2018 56.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 13:50, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RMLI Greenport 2018 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Peulle 12:55, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jodrell Bank Observatory 2018 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 496.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 18:33, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Cape Town (MP) 2018 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:26, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Basilica of the National Shrine of Our Lady of Aparecida 2019 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 09:37, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Rio de Janeiro 2019 274.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:38, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Convite para participar do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil 2025!

Imagem vencedora do concurso nacional em 2024

Saudações, @Mike Peel

Como você participou de um ou mais concursos fotográficos no passado, estou enviando esta mensagem para te convidar para participar da edição de 2025 do Wiki Loves Cultura Popular Brasil, um concurso fotográfico que valoriza o patrimônio imaterial brasileiro!

Como você pode participar?

Visite a página do concurso na Wikipédia e navegue pelas listas de elementos culturais brasileiros, que estão divididos em seis categorias:

• Culinária
• Danças, festivais e músicas
• Pessoas, conhecimentos e atividades
• Roupas e fantasias
• Tradições, rituais e expressões orais
• Teatro e artes cênicas

Envie suas fotografias e você estará participando automaticamente do concurso!

Premiação

As melhores fotos, vídeos e áudios concorrem a prêmios em cada categoria, além de uma premiação especial para a melhor foto do Maranhão e também para a melhor mídia geral, cujo(a) fotógrafo(a) receberá uma bolsa para participar da WikiCon Brasil 2025, em Salvador. Além disso, as imagens do concurso nacional concorrem a diversos prêmios na etapa internacional.

Qualquer dúvida que você tiver, por favor me envie uma mensagem.

Novamente, muito obrigado pela sua participação nos concursos anteriores, estou ansioso por ver mais fotografias suas esse ano! EPorto (WMB) (talk) 22:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 11:57, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 12:07, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beaumaris Castle 2015 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me with coordinates. --Milseburg 10:45, 16 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, coordinate added. Thanks. Mike Peel 10:54, 16 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks --Milseburg 10:58, 16 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument to Antonio Stoppani, Wikimania 2016, MP 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 07:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:14, 17 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:16, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:39, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality of the photo is good, but file name could be more precise. --Milseburg 16:59, 18 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a little bit too bright, but good composition and good sharpness. -- Spurzem 09:47, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:45, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 21:38, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Help with Wikidata Infobox

Moin Mike, I hope you are good ;) Long time no hear. I habe there a file File:On the Mississippi with the DJI Avata FPV Video Drone - February 12, 2023.webm and its on the maintenance categories. Can you see from where that comes? Thanks for checking --Crazy1880 (talk) 13:51, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

@Crazy1880: After some digging, it turned out to be this. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 14:37, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Oho, really thanks, that I hadn't seen. Thanks and a nice weekend --Crazy1880 (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rail01 09:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rail01 09:41, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rail01 09:42, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rail01 09:42, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Castello di Sassai 2025 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rail01 09:42, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 20:06, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 07:32, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Leiden 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:06, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Leiden 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:30, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Leiden 2024 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Leiden 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:25, 22 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:27, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and good image -- Spurzem 11:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At the British Museum 2024 085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 18:22, 23 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 066.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:06, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:14, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 105.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 24 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rbrechko 13:25, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 572.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:16, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 573.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:32, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 07:35, 25 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nikride 08:37, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 077.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Btspurplegalaxy 06:45, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks fine but the cropped person at the left border should be removed --Poco a poco 07:13, 25 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, cropped, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 22:39, 26 February 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:24, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 11:09, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:53, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, Victoria Embankment Gardens, February 2025 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:59, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 068.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 11:52, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:02, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 163.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:29, 2 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:39, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 17:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Berthold Werner 15:01, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --RockyMasum 17:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Benjism89 18:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 020.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:35, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Горбунова М.С. 17:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 168.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Pi bot

Hi. It looks like Quality images candidates/statistics page hasn't been updated since 1st of March. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:51, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

@Екатерина Борисова: Thanks for the heads-up. That's weird, I just tried running the script locally and it works fine, let's see if Pi bot restarts updating it later today. I'm travelling at the moment, so I can't look directly at the bot logs... It might have been an unexpected data format in an archive or something, not sure. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 09:49, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick reply. I think it's not the badly urgent task, so I just wanted to let you know. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 084 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 085 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 089 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, but I agree with Peulle regarding the file namings --Poco a poco 20:38, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 091 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:49, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:17, 6 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 14:41, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:11, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Princeton University 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:17, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tallinn 2024 090 - Balti jaam station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments These photos are OK, but the file names should be changed to something more representative of what the photo depicts. "At Tallinn" could mean virtually anything.--Peulle 11:28, 6 March 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, files renamed, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 10:06, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Yep.  Support--Peulle 23:29, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The busy foreground is a bit distracting. Maybe you can crop it. --MB-one 15:35, 28 February 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, I was trying to get the contrast between foreground and background but guess it hasn't worked out in this photo, so I've cropped it - does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 13:20, 4 March 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:16, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, Victoria Embankment Gardens, February 2025 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:38, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1304.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs perspective correction, whole picture is leaning to the right. Otherwise good. --Plozessor 05:11, 8 March 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 10:13, 8 March 2025 (UTC)  Support Thx, good now! --Plozessor 03:58, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, Victoria Embankment Gardens, February 2025 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:58, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:40, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 597.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:13, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 13:05, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 076.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 22:47, 13 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:25, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 09:25, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RM1941 on The Strand, February 2025 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 01:48, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 634.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:09, 14 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 204.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:06, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Didcot Railway Centre 2024 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 11:52, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:08, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At São Paulo 2023 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:00, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 089.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 12:27, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museo Histórico Militar de Canarias 2023 408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:05, 16 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:17, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 073.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 08:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:33, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:23, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Sardinia Radio Telescope 2024 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Bijay Chaurasia 05:59, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:42, 19 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:56, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, Victoria Embankment Gardens, February 2025 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 14:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, filename should be improved though. --Plozessor 04:19, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Salinas del Carmen 2022 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Memorial Aeroespacial Brasileiro 2023 137.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 14:27, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, look at the background --Poco a poco 22:24, 20 March 2025 (UTC) PC redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 07:30, 21 March 2025 (UTC)  Support Indeed, QI --Poco a poco 09:38, 21 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:29, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 19:31, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RM1941 on The Strand, February 2025 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Right crop (top half) doesn't look so good --Poco a poco 22:30, 20 March 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality and good framing --A S M Jobaer 07:04, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the reviews, I've cropped the right a little to remove the building edges, hope that helps. Thanks. Mike Peel 07:22, 21 March 2025 (UTC) Yes, definitely better, Mike. A S M Jobaer, please, don't overrule the reviews of other reviewers here, that's not civic. Poco a poco 08:44, 22 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 09:32, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:38, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Phyrexian 19:41, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 322.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 02:03, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:08, 25 March 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:24, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Deleting geographical information

Could you please stop to delete geographical information. ---- Greetings Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 20:43, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

I'm confused, can you explain? Mike Peel (talk) 20:45, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

While telling that the bot is tidying the Wikidata Infobox it is deleting geographical information. ---- Greetings Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 21:12, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

With edits like [1]? The information is on Wikidata and is displayed in the infobox, there's no point in duplicating it as that just adds clutter to the category. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:42, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RM1941 on The Strand, February 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:41, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 317.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 08:14, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:56, 26 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Aesculus indica and Aesculus hippocastanum

I see you have incorrectly reverted my edits to two Kew images yesterday.

Aesculus indica is NOT the same species as Aesculus hippocastanum. Therefore to have an image talking about Aesculus indica flowering in a category as a "quality" image of Aesculus hippocastanum is utterly nonsensical and objectively wrong.

Are they good quality images? Yes. Are they images of Aesculus hippocastanum? No. Therefore by definition they cannot be good quality images of Aesculus hippocastanum.

I would have no objection to them being in a quality images of Aesculus indica category. However I will re-remove them from the incorrect category you have put them in. David Newton (talk) 13:13, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

@David Newton: Ah, thanks for the clarification. I was puzzled why the edit 'Adding categories' removed one and the Quality Image template. I've moved them over to Category:Quality images of Aesculus, hope that's OK? Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

I saw that you beat me to it. The quality images category is likely a metacategory. They are very good images indeed and given how much rarer Aesculus indica is in the UK than Aesculus hippocastanum trickier to capture.

I'm actually overwhelmed with choice for Aesculus near where I live. There are the usual hippocastanum and × carnea nearby. However there are also specimens of indica, flava, pavia and tens of glabra around as well. Not usual for the UK! David Newton (talk) 13:31, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:09, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 635.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:37, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 072.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2023 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:38, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Montevideo 2023 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 14:35, 28 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 096.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 13:12, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 098.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 12:58, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York, USA 2017 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:13, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:25, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, great subject. --Myrealnamm 21:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 075.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, interesting subject. --Myrealnamm 21:28, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good resolution, composition and post processing. Adequate categorization. --Rkieferbaum 17:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rkieferbaum 17:29, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Sardinia 2025 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:13, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Area archeologica di Pranu Muttedu 2025 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Area archeologica di Pranu Muttedu 2025 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Area archeologica di Pranu Muttedu 2025 022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:35, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Area archeologica di Pranu Muttedu 2025 074.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:15, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportOK --St. Krug 19:46, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 087.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 20:02, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:28, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 100.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At American Airpower Museum 2024 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:41, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:28, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:26, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:27, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 082.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:45, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 07:53, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Jardin de Cactus 2022 106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:41, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tharros, Sardinia 2024 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --St. Krug 12:39, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Tidy Infobox call

Hi Mike, i expected that your Bot also removes the redundant qid parameter? But it did not so so, e. g. : https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AK%C3%A1roly_Wittich-Eperjesi&diff=1014202585&oldid=1013884024 --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 10:51, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 080.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 06:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Lanzarote 2022 065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:07, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 094.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 07:35, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 033.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:57, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:58, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:03, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Llez 04:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 131.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:22, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 07:50, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2022 227.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --St. Krug 18:21, 10 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 140.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 11:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 11:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2023 167.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Olivier LPB 11:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --AuHaidhausen 07:34, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 603.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction needed. --Vsatinet 14:48, 10 April 2025 (UTC) Perspective redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:05, 11 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Much better. Slightly unsharp in upper part, but I think it's good enough for QI --Vsatinet 17:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Faro de Tostón 2022 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 13:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statue of Sir Wilfrid Lawson, 2nd Baronet, Victoria Embankment Gardens, February 2025 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 13:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Foxfield Light Railway 2024 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments sky burnt out a bit, picture slightly tilted to the right (maybe 0,3-05 degree) -fixable? --Grunpfnul 07:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC) Perspective redone, I've tried to improve the sky, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 041.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I propose lighten up the shadows a bit. --Milseburg 09:01, 11 April 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, shadows lightened, how does that look? Thanks. Mike Peel 17:00, 11 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good Thanks. --Milseburg 10:34, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! RHS Garden Bridgewater 2022 084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 12:12, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:59, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Fuerteventura 2022 047.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:16, 13 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of Sao Paulo campus 2016 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:06, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tokyo 2024 491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 11:39, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments tilts to the left --Grunpfnul 09:02, 12 April 2025 (UTC) Perspective redone, is that better? Thanks. Mike Peel 19:42, 12 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:46, 14 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:41, 15 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 280.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 00:59, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 19:54, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 434.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 278.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Екатерина Борисова 22:11, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! University of Sao Paulo campus 2016 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 07:34, 16 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:34, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 228.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Ok. --Sebring12Hrs 09:31, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2024 210.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 240.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Berlin 2024 242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:19, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Dunham Massey 2023 34.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:12, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Basildon Park 2024 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lrkrol 14:04, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:27, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At La Palma 2020 315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 17:44, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Museum of American Armor 2024 091.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 102 - Grace Quan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 20:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California Highway One 2015 010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 20:03, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heaton Park 2016 035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:05, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 08:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 030.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Espandero 08:44, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Katowice 2024 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:49, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:27, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At San Francisco 2015 104 - Grace Quan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:57, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! California Highway One 2015 008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Kyoto 2024 526.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 21:06, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! There and Now, Marylebone, March 2025 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunham Massey 2016 108.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 07:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments cw tilt and too soft --Poco a poco 07:50, 19 April 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, perspective redone, sharpened, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 15:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lvova 07:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Elephant seals

You took a number of pictures that are in Category:Mirounga angustirostris at Piedras Blancas. I would guess (but cannot be certain) that they are more specifically Category:Mirounga angustirostris at Elephant Seal Vista Point. If I'm right, could you please move them to that more specific category? (The intersection category didn't exist at the time you uploaded these; most images got one category or the other--the vista point or the one you used--even though it looks like most belong in both.)

Thanks in advance for any help. - Jmabel ! talk 00:47, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

I see that File:Elephant Seal Bay 2015 013.jpg was definitely taken there (I can tell where you were standing when you took it), so if they were all taken more or less in one place, then this was the place. - Jmabel ! talk 00:51, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

& I see some others that definitely were there... - Jmabel ! talk 01:01, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

@Jmabel: You are correct, I stopped at that view point and took the set of photos. I've moved them over to the new category, and also added a few others I took at the same time to Category:Elephant Seal Vista Point. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 07:40, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrance to Westminster Magistrates' Court, March 2025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 125.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 126.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 127.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 128.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 08:30, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Palmetum de Santa Cruz de Tenerife 2022 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 22:20, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Kızıl 13:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 219.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:57, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1299.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:59, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 142.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 03:27, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 101.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:05, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 1301.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:20, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Shougissime 12:39, 26 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Tenerife 2023 220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No problem with the quality of the garbage, but is it free to take a photo of an "art object" ? --Olivier LPB 15:26, 23 April 2025 (UTC) Thanks for looking. It should be fine per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama/Europe#Spain. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:17, 25 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:33, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:30, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 08:49, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 18:39, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wiki Indaba 2023 183.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:10, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wiki Indaba 2023 185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 12:48, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At New York City 2023 026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ZarlokX 18:40, 29 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 410.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 17:04, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2025 121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 05:31, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 423.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments PC is needed and CA needs to be removed at the borders of the image. But even afther doing that I think it's not good enough for a QI --FlocciNivis 17:55, 24 April 2025 (UTC) Thanks for the review, PC and CA redone, along with a few other tweaks while I was at it. Hope that helps, thanks either way. Thanks. Mike Peel 17:12, 25 April 2025 (UTC) The sky is overexposed. I would promote if you cropped it out. --Trougnouf 19:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC) Cropped, how's that? Thanks. Mike Peel 16:15, 30 April 2025 (UTC)  Support Good, thank you. --Trougnouf 18:21, 30 April 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2025 289.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --TorinoDoc 08:21, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2025 290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ZarlokX 10:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2025 291.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2025 292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 06:25, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Long Island 2025 294.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ZarlokX 10:06, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 436.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:50, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wiki Indaba 2023 190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 19:04, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Wiki Indaba 2023 193.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Georgfotoart 10:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Mariposario del Drago 2022 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 09:35, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:05, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 028.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Barcelona 2019 034.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 07:05, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At London 2024 433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Harlock81 17:17, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! At Oxford 2024 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 17:04, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Parque Villa-Lobos 2018 023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 12:06, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 7 May 2025 (UTC)